TECHNET Archives

June 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roberto Torres <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Roberto Torres" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:43:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (222 lines)
Thanks Stephen Joy,

Looks like Jack Olson was right. Looks like our suspicions were correct
also.
Again thanks to all.

Roberto Torres C.I.D.
Sr. PCB Designer
Matsushita Avionics Systems Corporation

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Joy, Stephen C [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                Sent:   Friday, June 04, 1999 10:23 AM
                To:     [log in to unmask]
                Subject:        Re: [DC] Silkscreen feature in between fine
pitch

                It's been a few years since I was in the screen print room,
but here is my
                opinion.

                The problem with legend ink dams are:

                1. it is thermal, so where it lays is where it stays.
                2. line width minimums are around .004-.005", less will give
skipping.
                3. Legend ink bleeds. Depending on the ink viscosity, room
conditions and
                curing characteristics you can add .002" to the line width.
                4. If no mask on pad is the quality requirement, then the
registration
                tolerance on a .020" pitch  and .012" pad will be +/- .002"
for legend
                printing.

                Combine all of these variables and you have quality problem.
I doubt that
                anyone is using this process, and if they are, ink on pads
is acceptable. If
                they are and are using a photoimageable legend ink, they are
paying too much
                for the boards.

                If your process has solder bridging with nothing (or solder
mask) between
                pads then there is another problem, and it isn't the pcb
design.

                If ink on the pad is no issue, make it primary solder mask.
Design the mask
                .008" wide for the .012" space. This will usually give clean
pads, but there
                will be some low level of fallout, based on the process
controls of your
                supplier. It may not be as thick as legend, but it will be
more reliable and
                have comparable yields for bridging.

                Steve


                -----Original Message-----
                From: Mike Gish [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 9:14 AM
                To: [log in to unmask]
                Subject: Re: [DC] Silkscreen feature in between fine pitch


                The article was published in the June issue of Printed
Circuit Design.  The
                article is named "Being first
                matters" Describes how Thomson Electronics uses several
methods to "do it
                right the first time" etc.
                Including software that allows for pitch compensation during
autoplacement.
                Solder thieving pads for wave
                solder, and silkscreen features on fine pitch components to
stop solder
                bridging.  (How they impliment this
                is what we have all been trying to figure out)  By the way
your questions
                about registrations was my exact
                question!  You are right on target!
                Mike Gish
                Sr. PCB Designer
                Ditron Manufacturing, Inc.
                Phoenix, AZ


                Jack Olson wrote:

                > Well, not that my experience means anything, but I have
never seen that
                > technique.
                > I would think silkscreen registration is poor relative to
the small space
                > between fine-pitch pads, and even a slight error will
screw up your
                > assembly/soldering.
                >
                > I would like to know where that article was published,
                > or hear from others who do it successfully.
                >
                > Jack
                > (my employer stands behind every opinion I have....
<grin>)
                >
                >                 -----Original Message-----
                >                 From:   Roberto Torres
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                >                 Re: Silkscreen feature in between fine
pitch
                >
                >                 No one else uses the below mentioned
silkscreen technique?
                >
                >                 On Wednesday, June 02, 1999 10:52 AM, Mike
Gish Wrote:
                >
                >                                 I just finished reading an
article that
                > described adding
                >                 silksreen
                >                                 features in between pads
on fine pitch
                > components to create
                >                 an
                >                                 additional solder barrier
between pads.
                > Does anyone have
                >                 any experience
                >                                 doing this?
                >
                >
################################################################
                > DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by
IPC using
                LISTSERV 1.8c
                >
################################################################
                > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to
[log in to unmask] with
                following text in the body:
                > To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
                > To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
                >
################################################################
                > Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line
Services"
                section for additional information.
                > For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at
[log in to unmask] or
                847-509-9700 ext.312
                >
################################################################


################################################################
                DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by
IPC using
                LISTSERV 1.8c

################################################################
                To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following
                text in the body:
                To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
                To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil

################################################################
                Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line
Services" section
                for additional information.
                For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at
[log in to unmask] or
                847-509-9700 ext.312

################################################################


################################################################
                DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by
IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c

################################################################
                To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following text in the body:
                To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
                To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil

################################################################
                Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line
Services" section for additional information.
                For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at
[log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312

################################################################

################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2