TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marc R. Sinclair" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Sep 96 08:13:07
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)

Dear Technet and Donald:

		When Donald said "copper gold galvanic" I thought that he meant copper on
gold,
which I have seen. Not galvanic etch. Which I've just become aware of due to
one of this subject Technet reply. Galvanic etch is definitively possible,
but a thin layer of copper plated to the gold tabs due to a galvanic
reaction is also a possibility and a reason for seeing copper instead of
gold. You got to check to see if there is gold under the copper. The
difference in this scenario thou is that the reaction does not seem to occur
in the microetch, but in the Conditioner. This of corse,   pertaining to our
process only. Which is clean; microetch, condition, OSP, and dry. Rinsing in
between each step logical. By the way, our process is under control. This
thin layer of copper on the gold use to be a problem. Now, about this
"galvanic etch". I've never seen it with our microetch in the SP process. So
I  think that covering the gold tabs prier to OSP is a step wasting time and
money. I don't know all the applications of OSP though so a shop that has to
have a more aggressive micro etched surface may not be able to avoid this
step.
	I hope I've been some help. I've learned from this Technet session, that's
for sure. I'll keep an eye out for galvanic etch in my process. And now I
have a name for the reason we get that thin layer of copper on our gold
fingers when the copper gets to high in our conditioner.

------------------------Reply Separator----------------------------------

>To: "Marc R. Sinclair" <[log in to unmask]>, "technet" <[log in to unmask]>
                      RE>>FAB:OSP:copper gold galvanic during*     9/20/96

I pulled out this TechNet submission from Thad McMillan from 4/25/96 which
described the general problem.  Hope this helps!

Regards,
Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems
Chelmsford, MA  
[log in to unmask]
-------
     We have had a problem in the past with OSP/bare copper boards with 
     gold fingers.  It might be related.  It occurs along the gold/copper 
     interface.  When the board goes through the microetch prior to the OSP 
     coating the bare copper traces entering the gold fingers were over 
     etched at the gold/copper interface.  
     
     For some reason, the term the "experts" used was "galvonic etch", the 
     microetch at the interface becomes too agressive resulting in etch 
     outs at the interface.  Very difficult to see.  Since electrical test 
     is before the OSP treatment we have had opens in final product as a 
     result of this..
     
     Our design solution was to make sure the soldermask overlaps the gold 
     fingers and also that there was enough room to insure the taping prior 
     to gold plating completely covered any bare copper. 
     
     Never saw this in HASL boards with gold fingers.  The exposed 
     copper/nickel/gold interface seemed to be the cause.  
     
     Someone else will have to explain the chemistry.
     
     [log in to unmask]

--------------------------------------
Date: 9/20/96 12:59 PM
To: Greg Bartlett
From: Marc R. Sinclair


To: [log in to unmask]
	
	Dear Donald: 
					
	"Copper gold galvanic during OSP application. " If you mean that there is
copper sticking to your gold tabs after OSP treatment then this has been a
problem we've had before too. It could be two things. One is that there
might be an electrical leak in your microetch that deposits the copper back
on the gold. I've seen it happen when recleaning panels. Our heater was
shorting into the bath. The other is, that if your running Lea Ronal OSP,
and see only copper depositing on the same fingers repeatedly like we did,
then the copper in the Conditioner is to high. Like above 60 ppm copper.
Dilution is the solution. High copper in the Concentrate just gives you
spotting in which case dilution is the only solution again. Unless the
copper can be electrowinned out of the bath. I will be experimenting with
both bath soon. Other than that I couldn't tell you without any more
information.
Marc

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2