TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Component solder reliability
From:
Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:59:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines) 
Makes me think if what my Business Admin professor used to say: "in most
(business) arguments people are in heated agreement".
Because they use different words for the same meaning.

Ahne.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Fenner
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 15:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Component solder reliability

Yes. I think we are in agreement. Just a difference in words.

Mike

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


--- Original message ---
From: Peter G. Houwen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 28 September 2015 14:38:17
Subject: Re: [TN] Component solder reliability
To: [log in to unmask]

> Mike, I think the point is more that shear and pull test results don't 
> always relate to long term reliability.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2