TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 21 Oct 1996 12:07:48 +0400 (EDT)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
TechNetters, about 2 years ago, this company had a discussion with a 
customer who found 2 or 3 non-functional boards out of a batch of 
approximately 100.  The electrical test at that time was not structured 
to check a few of the nets on the boards, and, sure enough, some 
escaped.  The customer was eager to have the test improved and corrective 
action taken.  About 1 month later, the customer returned with another 
question:  How much money would we save if no electrical testing were done?

I would suggest fabricators and users agree on acceptable quality levels 
for bare boards before any contracts are made.  I agree OEMs should not 
have to test, either at the bare or assembled stage, quality into circuit 
boards.

Lou Hart
Compunetics Quality Assurance


.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2