TECHNET Archives

June 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ralph Richart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 5 Jun 2000 09:04:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Hi all:

We are a are presently discussing x-out allowances for bare fabs.  My
questions are:

1. Are no x-out policies common?

2. Is it reasonable to expect to pay a premium for no x-outs?

3. If no x-out's are not reasonable or economically possible, what are
reasonable x-out requirements?
        For example, I've seen it specified that no single panel may
have more than 20% x-out, and no more than 5% of the total order may
have x'd out panels.

4. How difficult / costly is it for an assembly operation to deal with
x-outs?

thanks for you input....

ralph richart

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2