TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Barmuta <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 1996 09:10:19 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (75 lines)
	Hi Rudy:Last time I checked 10 microns = 0.4 mils :)		
		Anyway the 5-15 micron thickness(0.2-0.6 mils)sounds like	
		a thickness for fused Sn/Pb final solderable finish,too 
		much for an etch resist.We plate about 2 microns or 0.08	
		mils.							
					Regards				
					Michael Barmuta			
					Staff Engineer			
					Fluke Corp.			
					Everett Wa.			
					(206)356-6076 
On Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:50:50 -0700 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> From: [log in to unmask]> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:50:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: FAB: Tin Lead etch resists (fwd)
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> 
> In a message dated 96-10-25 18:06:59 EDT, you write:
> 
> >What is the minimum acceptable tin/lead etch resist thickness useable in
> >practice?  We have people using anything from 5 to 15 microns and 
obviously
> >need>to get people to use a minimum thickness to minimise waste and
> treatment
> >costs as>well as environmental impact.
> 
> 10 microns = 2.5 mils is about the minimum standard in the US, but the
> practical minimum is determined on a shop by shop basis, and is a function 
of
> plating speed, which in reality determines throwing power, (thus slower
> plating=more uniform deposit=lower minimum plating required) and uniformity
> of current density over the boards being plated.
> 
> >How practical are lead free/or reduced lead alternatives e.g. pure tin?
> >
> Very practical, and in the US, pure Tin is now the prevalent etch resist.
> 
> >What options are there for tin/lead stripping solutions that might be
> capable
> >of>recycling the dissolved metals?
> 
> Anything is possible, if the financial incentives are present (which they
> are, at least currently), and the government bureaucrats are not.
> 
> However, given the state of the PCB fabrications industry (Which, 
summarized,
> can be described as "If you don't like the way things are being done now,
> wait 3 months, they will change), a business person would be better off
> putting money into roulette than investing in a major metals recycling 
plant,
> which depended on spent Tin, or Tin/Lead stripper as a raw material.
> 
> Rudy Sedlak
> RD Chemical Company
> 
> ***************************************************************************
> * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ***************************************************************************
> * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
> * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
> ***************************************************************************
> 



***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2