TECHNET Archives

February 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:28:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
February 11, 2004

Folks, does anyone out there have any info on the plus and minus of using nickel flash vice copper flash on a gold-plated brass standoff terminal.  We had an OEM that experienced "black nickel" which caused soldering problems.  To solve the problem, the OEM will switch to copper flash.  From what I am able to determine, the only real difference is that using nickel allows thinner top coating of gold, which means a less costly process.

From a reliability standpoint, it appears that either copper or nickel flash over a brass standoff terminal should be acceptable.  Any comments 
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
would be appreciated.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2