TECHNET Archives

March 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"jbrunett" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Mar 97 16:06:49 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
     Hi Patty,
     
     I do not have a solution for your problem, but here are some questions 
     that may help lead you to a solution.
     
     From your description, you have core materials on the outer layers?  
     Are the 2 / 9 cores of the same core thickness and manufacturing lot?
     Were the 2 / 9 cores imaged and etched at the same time as the 
     remaining cores?
     
     You may have a problem with your tooling system in the inner layer 
     imaging operation.  (a brief description of your system may help)
     
     Are you sure that this is a "shift" and not a "shrinkage" of the 2 / 9 
     images?  If there is a shrinkage, you will need to compensate the 2 / 
     9 CAD data.  If there is an image shrinkage of the 2 / 9 layers, the 
     "shift" should be symmetrical around the center of the panel.  
     
     Good Luck,
     Joe Brunetto
     Process Engineer
     Zycon Corporation


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FAB(Shifting Layers)
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    3/20/97 12:47 PM


We are experincing a reaccuring problem with our lamination process on 10 
layer projects with the following stackup: 
     
1.  1 oz copper on all 5 FR4 5 mil sheets;
2.  3 sheets of PGFK1080 2.5mil prepreg in each gap (total of 7.5mils each 
gap); 
3.  Grain of prepreg is in the same direction; 
4.  finished thickness 69 mils;
5.  layers 2-4 & 7-9 are signal layers; 
6.  layers 5&6 are ground/VCC planes.
     
Problem:  We are consistently seeing layers 2 and 9 shift 3-4 mils more than 
the other layers (3:4, 5:6, & 7:8).  Layers 3:4, 5:6, & 7:8 all align well 
with each other and the outermost sheets are shifted to the right by this 3-4 
mils.  Once layers 1 and 10 are imaged onto the drilled panel, they also line 
up well with the innermost layers (3:4, 5:6, & 7:8).  We are losing panels due 
to annualar rings less than 2 mils on layers 2 & 9 (Mil-P-55110).
     
We would appreciate any suggestions from those who have seen similar 
occurances.
     
Patty Causey / Marty W. Sheppard
Process Engineering Section
email address:  [log in to unmask] / 
[log in to unmask]
Phone: (912) 926-9473(9632)
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   * 
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
     

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2