TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"marc decantillon" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 06 Jun 96 08:51:44 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
        Can someone direct me toward existing INDEPENDENT studies done on 
     comparing various SMT equipment (particularly P&P)?
     
        I am currently involved in evaluating SMT equipment for a low to 
     medium volume, high mix, specialty PCBA's (high temp & vib with 
     possible TAB applications).  As with any consumer issue, I'm getting 
     varied reports on what the equipment can do.  I'm getting the "Our 
     latest software rev will take care of that" speech on some equipment.
        Also, I am attending NEPCON East to get more info.  I was wondering 
     other than comparing spec.'s (speed, accuracy, heat profiling, etc.), 
     what are the intangibles that need to be considered?
     
     
     Marc DeCantillon
     Mfg. Eng. Group Leader
     Baker Hughes Inteq
     [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2