TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 09 May 96 16:19:27 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Suzanne,

The main philosophy behind J-STD-001B is process control.  Therefore, if you are 
not recording the rework that you are doing is your process truly in control or 
are you masking the soldering results to look good on paper.  From my point of 
view ( And this is strictly my opinion) you should be recording every defect and 
process variance that happens within the cell to improve the process within the 
cell.  In other words I would count all defects, no matter who catches them, use 
the information to determine if the process is in control and to improve the 
process for future product.

Tom Carroll
Hughes Aircraft Company
(310) 334-4757
[log in to unmask]

_______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: J-Std-001B work cell touchup
From:    [log in to unmask] at CCGATE
Date:    5/9/96  12:01 PM

We are reviewing converting Mil-Std-2000A and some old 454 contracts to the
J-std-001.  Also all new contracts would require this spec.  We have a team of
8 people from different facets within our organization looking at a matrix of
differences as well as questions of intepretations.  

I would like some input on defect observation from people in industry.  If you
work in a work cell environment with TQC checks and someone in the work cell
catches a defect do you count that defect or do you count it when it is
discovered in the next work cell.  An example would be at the wave solder
machine how do people feel about the acceptability that hand touchup done
within the wave solder cell without recording it as rework is permitted?  I
guess we're expanding our debate outside of our 8 person team and would like
your input.

Thanks, Suzanne Nachbor
[log in to unmask]


The following is an attached File item from cc:Mail.  It contains
information that had to be encoded to ensure successful transmission
through various mail systems.  To decode the file use the UUDECODE
program.
--------------------------------- Cut Here ---------------------------------
begin 644 rfc822.txt
M1G)O;2!496-H3F5T+7)E<75E<W1`:7!C+F]R9PT*6"U%;G9E;&]P92U&<F]M
M.B!496-H3F5T+7)E<75E<W1`:7!C+F]R9PT*4F5C96EV960Z(&9R;VT@<VEM
M;VXN:7!C+F]R9R`H,38X+C$Q,RXR-"XV-"D-"B!B>2!%1$5.+DA!0RY#3TT@
M*%!-1$8@5C0N,RTW(",U.#@T*2!I9"`\,#%)-$DQ53))1$)+,#`P5$--0$5$
M14XN2$%#+D-/33X[(%1H=2P-"B`Y($UA>2`Q.3DV(#$Q.C4Y.C0U(%!35`T*
M4F5C96EV960Z(&9R;VT@:7!C+F]R9R!B>2!S:6UO;BYI<&,N;W)G('9I82!3
M3510("@Y-#`X,38N4T=)+C@N-BXY+SDT,#0P-BY31TDI#0H@:60@3D%!,34U
M.#8[([log in to unmask]@,3DY-B`Q,SHU,SHS,2`M,#<P,`T*4F5C96EV960Z
M(&)Y(&EP8RYO<F<@*%-M86EL,RXQ+C(X+C$@(S(I(&ED(&TP=4A85#4M,#`P
M,%-90SL@5&AU+`T*(#D@36%Y(#DV(#$P.C$W($-$5`T*4F5S96YT+61A=&4Z
M(%1H=2P@,#D@36%Y(#$Y.38@,3,Z-3,Z,S$@+3`W,#`-"D1A=&4Z(%1H=2P@
M,#D@36%Y(#$Y.38@,#DZ-#@Z,#D@*S`X,#`@*%4I#0I297-E;G0M9G)O;3H@
M5&5C:$YE=$!I<&,N;W)G#0I&<F]M.B!.86-H8F]R(%-U>F%N;F4@/&YA8VAB
M;W)?<W5Z86YN94!M;C$U+6=W+FUA=F0N:&]N97EW96QL+F-O;3X-"E-U8FIE
M8W0Z($HM4W1D+3`P,4(@=V]R:R!C96QL('1O=6-H=7`-"E)E<V5N="US96YD
M97(Z(%1E8VA.970M<F5Q=65S=$!I<&,N;W)G#0I297-E;G0M<V5N9&5R.B!4
M96-H3F5T+7)E<75E<W1`:7!C+F]R9PT*5&\Z(&EP8R!T96-H;F5T(#QT96-H
M;F5T0&EP8RYO<F<^#0I297-E;G0M;65S<V%G92UI9#H@/")S3W9Z3"XP+G9-
M02XU;U=A;B)`:7!C/@T*365S<V%G92UI9#H@/&XQ,S@P-#@U,#DS+C,R.#8Q
M0&UN,34M9W<N;6%V9"YH;VYE>7=E;&PN8V]M/@T*6"U-86EL97(Z($UA:6PJ
M3&EN:R!33510+4U3(#,N,"XR#0I#;VYT96YT+71R86YS9F5R+65N8V]D:6YG
M.B`W0DE4#0I/;&0M4F5T=7)N+5!A=&@Z(#QN86-H8F]R7W-U>F%N;F5`;6XQ
M-2UG=RYM879D+FAO;F5Y=V5L;"YC;VT^#0I8+4UA:6QI;F<M3&ES=#H@/%1E
M8VA.971`:7!C+F]R9SX@87)C:&EV92]L871E<W0O,SDX-PT*6"U,;V]P.B!4
B96-H3F5T0&EP8RYO<F<-"E!R96-E9&5N8V4Z(&QI<W0-"@``
  
end



ATOM RSS1 RSS2