TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lambert-Nash <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 1996 23:12:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
As the industry heads towards a point where surface mount technology and
dense circuit topologies are the norm it becomes imperative to revisit
the issue of to tent or not to tent. 
With liquid photoimageable solder masks still being an unreliable means
of providing a uniformly conformal coating over copper features, is dry
film the answer?  Have strides been made of late in this technology
which allay the inherent problems of process control, media thickness,
and contamination due to oily residue buildup and its subsequent promise
of sundry other problems such as delimitation?  Has MIL SPEC 2000 (is
rev C out yet?) acquiesced in the use of either the dry film or lpi
tenting of vias as an acceptable practice?
I have seen boards produced in the orient with dry film thicknesses as
small as 50 microns.  Are these available in the US or is their use
shunned as being too thin?  The suppliers I have spoken with cite
minimum thicknesses in the >1 mil range.  This lays bare other problems,
such as potential tomb stoning while providing the opposite benefit of
creating a solder well around SMT lands.  The latter stated benefit is
of dubious value if paste stencils and application coupled with fine
tuned temperature control bogs down production and outweighs the
reliability bonus, if any.
It is a confusing issue and all the literature I can find seems to be
horribly out of date (the latest being an excerpt from PC FAB magazine
dated 1991.  I am reasonably certain things have progressed since then,
but where is the data?
If you have any insights into this well masked dilemma, I for one could
stand the relief.
[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2