TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"D.C.Whalley" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Bob,

I have seen serious cracking in tests on 1812 capacitors in -55 to +125C test.
They are a good bit smaller and the TCE mismatch not so bad so I am not at
all surprised at what you are seeing.

I would treat 1206's as the limit in kit that is going to see those sorts of
temperatures (-55) regularly in service, unless measures are taken to reduce
the problem.

David Whalley


>I have been looking at some 20 pin Leadless Ceramic Chip Carriers which have
>exhibited cracks. They are mounted on standard FR4 and thermal cycled between
>-55 +80 for 1000 hours.
>
>Cracking is a problem with this device as we know but not at these low lead
>counts. Many uses in their design rules make 28 pin devices the limit and then
>incorporate the use of matched substrate to reduce differential expansion.
>
>I would appreciate any feed back on failure that people have seen on testing of
>low lead count devices or even feed back on where people see the limit on pin
>count and the need for special substrates.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2