Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 96 12:56:30 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like to see IPC's response on this subject because I'm under
the assumption that nailheading is no longer a reason for rejection.
(I've also been told that somewhere somebody ran tests and found
increased holewall adhesion due to the nailheading<increased cu to cu
plated sites>)(?????)
I would think that only in the case of positive etchback requirements
would nailheading really create an issue.
Am I correct or wrong in my thinking?
Groovy
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Nailheading
Author: [log in to unmask]
Date: 1/31/96 12:19 PM
Simple Question:
Has anybody found a functional defect in multilayer pwb's due to nailheading???
D.Rooke
([log in to unmask])
|
|
|