TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bill Fabry" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
4 Nov 1996 15:57:19 U
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
        Reply to:   RE>goldfinish on PC boards

Wolfgang:

A general rule to follow is, "If the gold content of the solder joint  is less
than 2% by volume, the solder joint will have long-term reliability".  With
gold greater than 2%, the solder joint will become brittle and subject to
cracking under thermal and/or mechanical stresses over the life of the
product.  This is based on an extensive test report published by Hewlett
Packard at least 5-7 years ago.  I do NOT have the report number.  Maybe
someone has a more recent report on the subject.

Solder paste is ~50% by volume metal (90% by weight).  Based on that rule, a
board with 30uinch of gold must have at least 0.003" of solder paste to have
good, reliable solder joints.

Good Luck!

Bill Fabry
Truevision, inc.
[log in to unmask]

--------------------------------------
Date: 11/4/96 12:46 PM
To: Bill Fabry
From: Wolfgang ERAT
Would appreciate any source for info on effects on solderjoint
reliability when assembling (solderpaste / IR Reflow ) a full gold
(approx 30 microinches thick) finished board. What are the effects of
the gold alloying with the tinlead in the joint ? / Thank you.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by rainbow.truevision.com with SMTP;4 Nov 1996 12:29:56 U
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id OAA28672; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 14:11:14 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 14:11:14 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
	id m0vKUCr-0000WYC; Mon, 4 Nov 96 12:57 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: DeskLink [Version B.02 95/10/31]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:  4 Nov 96 13:11 +0500
Sender: [log in to unmask] (Wolfgang Erat)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: goldfinish on PC boards
X-HPDESK-ID: 5627572 0 0 0 "NTMAIL  "
X-HPDESK-PRIORITY: 3
X-HPDESK-SYSTEM: 525
From: [log in to unmask] (Wolfgang ERAT)
X-FROM: "Wolfgang ERAT"@[GBY/QC]
X-HPDESK-TO: "A"@[[log in to unmask]] 
Content-Type: text/plain; 
        Name="/HPOFFICE/NETMAIL/C0947488.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; 
           Filename="/HPOFFICE/NETMAIL/C0947488.txt"
X-HPDESK-SUBJECT: Message text
Resent-Message-ID: <"aiyHd.0.fB3.snZVo"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/7370
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]



***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2