TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carey Ritchey/BURN/COM/AUGAT <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
28 Aug 96 13:35:40
Content-Type:
Text/Plain
Parts/Attachments:
Text/Plain (125 lines)
Thanks for your responses

The PCB is approx. 6" by 4"  it is 4 layer in the digital section  and 2 layer 
in the RF section


basic shape is


__________________________________
|  digital section  |
|     |
| |-------------------------------------------------
| |     |
| | RF section   |
----------|--------------------------------------------------

The RF section has components only located on the comp side  and Solid ground 
plane below
The digital section has comp both sides and inter power and ground planes 
the planes do not overlap the RF plane 
I will try the idea of a Faraday shield
Top side shielding of the RF section had no effect on Spurs.
I believe that the noise is getting into the RF section through the common 
ground point and is caused by loop length in the 
digital CLK and buss switching paths all the chips are bypassed by 10n and 100n 
0805 chip parts 2 parts at the power and 2 at the  GND pins 
I am now routing a six layer version of the PCB with comp. and sold. sides of 
the digital as fan out only plus digital ground
layer 1 (comp) is fan out and  digital GND plane
layer 2 is digital ground
layer 3 is digital routing
layer 4 is digital routing
layer 5 id Digital +5v (power)
layer six (sold) fan out and digital GND plane
the RF section will remain traces and comp on comp side solder side is solid 
gnd plane

Also a second question we are using SMT feed through caps to pass power and 
control signals in the RF section
usually the GND pin of a feed through cap is connected to the RF plane but Loop 
theory says that this will increase the loop length for the filtered noise at 
is will have to flow though the RF GND plane to the single RF/Digital point and 
then through the digital gnd plane to return to its source driver causing a 
very large loop area.

Thanks in advance





	jseeger @ rapidcad ("Jeff Seeger") 
08/27/96 09:48 AM
To: technet @ ipc.org @ INTERNET
cc:  (bcc: Carey Ritchey/BURN/COM/AUGAT)
Subject: Re: DES: EMI and micro switching induced noise



 Carey,

 I thought of another likely coupling mechanism.

 You have a gnd split to isolate the two sections.  You've probably
 done the due diligence of connecting the gnds at where your critical
 signal path crosses the realms.

 It's really easy for an engineer to say, "It's only <n> Mhz, non-
 critical, just let it cross the split and keep it away from the
 sensitive things on the analog side.

 Like most of us, including myself until I took an EMC course, we
 look at the line shown on the schematic as complete and "self-reliant".
 Right down to how we all represent a driver/receiver, we concern
 ourselves with the signal and ignore supply and return, which are
 "everywhere", right? Problem is each signal has an equal return path.
 For speeds below 20 Khz (yes, that's "K"), we're pretty much correct.
 Beyond that, the return path follows the signal exactly.

 If a signal of over 20 Khz crosses a ground (return) split, it's
 return current must find a path around the split.

 If some portion of your critical signal path transitioned across a
 gnd "web", and elsewhere a digital signal crossed the split, the
 return current for that digital signal likely traverses the same
 gnd web as your critical path.  BINGO, your two realms are sharing
 a conductor, namely gnd, and therefore coupling occurs.

 It's possible or even likely that webbing the gnd under the offending
 digital line would not be a good idea for other reasons.  If so, you
 may be able to tolerate this wandering return current by enlarging
 the gnd web at your critical crossing so that the digital returns
 find adequate conductor without the fields co-mingling.  I believe
 these field effects follow the rule of inverse squares, whether in
 Cu or dielectric (someone please correct me if I'm wrong!), so each
 increment of additional distance has exponential effect in isolation.  

 From here on out the potential mechanisms I could conjure will likely
 take more bandwidth than they're worth.

 Regards,
 
        Jeff Seeger                             Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
        Chief Technical Officer                      Tyngsboro, MA  01879
        [log in to unmask]                               508 649 9800

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2