The Gemini does use a positive displacement pump. We are also using
     3609.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________

Subject: Re: Glue
Author:  Pat McGuine <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date:    10/10/96 11:16 AM


I'm not familiar w/ how Gemini brings the needle down to get a consistent
z-height above the board.  It has been my experience however that it is
extraordinarily important that this is consistent.  I have an older Camalot,
we had to purchase a z-axis compensator for it from Camalot.  Also, does the
Gemini use a positive displacement pump?  I have also found that this helped
a lot.  We just switched from Loctite 348 to Loctite 3609.  3609 is much
better for us.




At 09:24 10/10/96 CDT, Paul Stolar wrote:
>     I am using a Camalot Gemini and I wonder if anyone out there has
>     experimented with how to reduce variation. I would prefer that Camalot
>     and Loctite not respond to this, I would like to hear from people in
>     the field. If you prefer, write to me off line. I will compile the
>     inputs w/o names and repost.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Paul Stolar
>     [log in to unmask]
>
>***************************************************************************
>* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
>***************************************************************************
>* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
>* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
>***************************************************************************
>
>
>

-Pat-

-------------
Patrick McGuine
Nicolet Instrument
[log in to unmask]
(608) 276-6334





Received: from gatekeeper.sciatl.com by ALPHA.CORP.SCIATL.COM
 (PMDF V4.3-13 #7203) id <[log in to unmask]>; Thu,
 10 Oct 1996 13:16:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smap@localhost by gatekeeper.sciatl.com via smapdV1.3 id
 NAA05644; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:18:54 -0400
Received: from ipc.org by gatekeeper.sciatl.com for <[log in to unmask]> via
 SMTP (smap V1.3) id sma005595; Thu Oct 10 13:18:39 1996
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
 id MAA17426; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 12:12:41 -0700
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vBO19-0000USC; Thu,
 10 Oct 96 11:31 CDT
Resent-date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 12:12:41 -0700
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 11:16:35 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-from: [log in to unmask]
From: Paul Stolar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re[2]: Glue
Resent-sender: [log in to unmask]
Resent-sender: [log in to unmask]
Resent-message-id: <"HkVVo1.0.rRK.LJINo"@ipc>
Message-id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Envelope-to: "Crowell, Mike%SA-SDO"@ccmail.corp.sciatl.com,
 "Geroux, Dick%SA-SDO"@ccmail.corp.sciatl.com,
 "Webb, Doug%SA-SDO"@ccmail.corp.sciatl.com
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Encoding: 51 Text
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6791
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list