TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 30 Jul 1996 16:15:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Nancy 

The ionic contamination number of 10.06 micrograms/in. sq. or 1.56 mictograms
per cm.sq. is pretty universal around the industry.  IPC-RB-276, IPC-6012,
J-STD-001, MIL-P-55110 and MIL-PRF-31032 all list this number as the max. for
cleanliness measurement and has been the value for a long time.  I am not
sure where the 6 micrograms/in.sq. or 0.96 micrograms/cm.sq. came from or on
what it is based, but it is not one of the more common callouts. As chairman
of the 276 task group, I found that our discussions alway led to retaining
the higher number which appear to be working for us.  If anybody has any
input into the 6 micrograms number or why it is used or needed, I would like
to hear from you.

Thanks
Phil HInton 
Hinton Engiineering 
[log in to unmask]        

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2