TECHNET Archives

November 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:35:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Clean solder dipped surface is tin rich.  Very similar to the tin fused
surface (surface=150 A - 200 A).  Based on the experiences on
storage/solderability data, it is believed that both fused tin and solder
dipped (or HASL) clean surfaces have very similar shelf life (oxidation).
For second level packaged PWA, 85C/85RH/5V type of tests showed very little
difference between the two surfaces (clean! properly).  If anyone has
different reliability test data, please let me know. By the way, strictly
speaking, the tin plated and fused is 98% tin... Never want to use pure tin
due to you know what... "cat" whiskers should stay as part of the cat, not
as part of the assembly.  ("Oh my fur and whiskers!"--1832-1898)
                                      jk
p.s. are you talking about 100% pure (strictly) tin?
At 09:51 PM 11/7/99 EST, you wrote:
>JK:
>
>Suspect, based strictly on observed phenomenon, that the EMF of fused solder
>could be one of those strange situations that does not follow the rules, and
>may be more passive than would be indicated by strictly looking at the table
>of EMF.  Indeed, if the 63/37 eutectic alloy is an actual compound, this
>would make sense.
>
>Have no data to back this up, simply note that fused solder is REAL passive,
>and has a REAL long shelf life, whereas pure Tin plating almost seems to
>oxidize as you watch it....
>
>Rudy Sedlak
>RD Chemical Company
>
>##############################################################
>TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>##############################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
>the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
>##############################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.5365
>##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2