TECHNET Archives

June 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karl Ring <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 1997 04:33:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
The measuring of ionic contamination gives some problems:

1. if there is a required limit of ionic residues check the specific
acceptance limit
   of your equipment. MIL-STD-2000A Appendix C shows a table of different
Instrument       acceptance  limits and equivalence factors.

2.Some solder masks are a good source of ionic residues. I have made
measurements of        cleaned boards with results of 13 ug/cm2. If the
solder mask is the source you can notice it     if you need a long
measuring time till the values become constant. Another method is a  
second test after baking the assembly or bare board. The result should be
lower than the first.  

3.Test the bare board. It should have max. 1.6 ug/cm2 (=3.1ug/cm2 when
using the       Ionograph).

Karl Ring
 ZVE 
Germany 
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2