Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet Mail Forum. |
Date: | Fri, 26 Sep 1997 12:28:52 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes,
My experience with Lifted fiducial pads can be attributed to one of
the following:
1. The angle at which the panel/board is fed through the HAL,
especially prominent with depanelized boards versus paneled.
2. Since you are using a HAL, you are more than likely to be running
panels at a 45 degree angle to obtain a coplanar surface. Doing
so, will require the edges of the board to make contact with the
tin rollers first, in turn applying localized preassure over the
fiducials/corner versus equalizing the roller preassure over the
span of the panel.
3. Item 2 worsens the issues further should you use copper foils of
1oz (seldom) and greater (2oz, very likely). The etch factor or
undercut that is associate with thicker copper weakens the
ficucial. SMT Lands don't experience this problem due to the
copper to laminate interface being greater.
4. Adjust the tin roller spacing. I somethimes found operators
running .093 or .125 thick boards through .062 set opening. The
Rollers need to be adjusted for the amount of copper weight in
addition to overall PCB thickness'.
5. More importantly is how many thermal excursions has this board gone
through. The solder pot temperature is typically 500F+-10.
If the first HASL is unsuccessful, allow the panel to cool before
processing again. Running the panels multiple times to close to
the Tg allows for material degradation, thus weakening the
copper to laminate interface and possible removal of the laminate
buttercoat.
Hope this helps,
John Gulley
Inet
1255 W. 15th St.
Plano, TX 75075
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [TECHNET] Lifted Fiducials
Author: Ron Hayashi <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
|
|
|