TECHNET Archives

January 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
paul reid <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, paul reid <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:56:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
I have to agree with Jeffery and Susan.  A degree of roughness is normal and
solder leveling smoothes the hole so you would not notice it typically.  Any
of the electroless processes will tend to make moderate roughness visible.
That being said, it is still a matter of degree of roughness that is of
concern.

Your question was "Does this impact on current carrying capacity?"  The
answer to that question is that, if the copper plating is within your
thickness specification, then the roughness of itself will not impact
current carrying capacities.

Macroscopically (say 50X) the back lit hole with an electroless finish
should look rough but round, maybe nodular or striated, but defiantly not
like a "star shaped cookie cutter center" with spikes, posts, or flakes of
copper sticking in from the edge of the PTH.  Be concerned if the minimum
hole size is violated.

I believe that microsectioning in this case is prudent.  Measure the
thickness of the copper in the thinnest part of the hole and expect it to
measure greater than .0008".  Next, look for gouges in the barrel of the
hole caused by drilling or etchback and expect them to be .001" or less.
Drill gouges are not usually an issue, even if they are large (.002"), but
they usually are not greater than .001" either.  If you find very large
drill gouging or very thin plating a flag should go up and a MRB review is
in order.

The picture posted looks normal.

Paul Reid

PWB Interconnect Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Bush [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silver plated barrel? does it reduce current carrying
ability?


This is actually how a copper plated barrel looks.  Some what rough
drilling, but not an issue unless there are voids in the plating.
Immersion coating like tin and silver are thin and will represent the
barrel topography.  Solder levels the barrel and masks the topography of
the walls.

Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support

VERMONT CIRCUITS INCORPORATED
  76 Technology Drive - POB 1890
    Brattleboro, Vermont 05302
      Voice: 802.257.4571.21 Fax: 802.257.0011
           http://www.vtcircuits.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Lamkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Silver plated barrel? does it reduce current carrying
ability?

I have just noticed the barrels on some boards that we now get silver
plated instead of tin plated so as to be lead free.

I can clearly see the laminate strands through this hole and many others
on the boards.

What difference is this from an ordinary tin plated hole?
looking at older boards, I can see nice shiny & flat holes & no ridges.

Is there something wrong with the holes that have been silver plated or
would they look like this anyway?

What impact does this have on the current carrying ability of a plated
hole?

I have managed to get a picture taken of one hole to indicate what I'm
on about.

http://www.ukxboxgamers.co.uk/BARRELL.jpg

Thankyou,
Matthew Lamkin.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2