TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jack W. Bryant" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 07 Sep 1996 06:47:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
TechNet,
As a result of what appears to be delamination during the assembly
process I have made a comparison between my copy of IPC-A-600, Rev.
E, 1995 and IPC-A-610, Rev. B, Amendment 1, 1996 and I would like to
here further arguments between the acceptable Pink Ring as pictured on
page 19 of my IPC-600 and the unacceptable delamination pictured on
page 82, figure 8-11, of my IPC-610. If Pink Ring is evidence of bond
separation, how can this be acceptable at the fab level and then
unacceptable at the assembly level? Please comment.

Thank you.
[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2