Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:03:58 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Blind/Buried vias: IPC-RB-276 calls for a minimum of .5 mil, as you stated, so I
would say that is the norm. For many in-house designs, we allow the 0.5 min for via
pairs (vias from layers 1 to layers 2), but require the full 1 mil for other Buried
vias, such as a via from layers 2 thru 13 on a 14 layer board.
Bab-Hui Lee-CTUA065 wrote:
>
> Hello all ye experts out there:
>
> Is there an IPC specs that calls for certain minimum copper thickness in the
> blind & buried vias? Is 0.5 mil the norm, or more is required??
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> __
> To: [log in to unmask]@INTERNET
> From: [log in to unmask]@INTERNET on Wed, Sep 18, 1996 12:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Users/designer of buried via product
>
> Jenni,
> It is not my experiance or expertise on buried vias (as a designer) you
> should look for, rather the experiance and expertise of your PWB
> manufacturer. Buried via technology has been around for quite some time and
> most Board Houses offering this technology are quite comfotable and
> proficient with it. If you bare board test you should be able to guarantee
> acceptable yields ( I have my board house do this testing to assure I only
> buy usable boards).
> As a designer I always attempt to stay away from this technology as it cost
> considerably more to fabricate and does not usually seem to "buy" me that
> much in added real estate.
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|