TECHNET Archives

September 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:50:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Hi Vlad - yes, any Sn based solder would be susceptible to gold
embrittlement since the other major element constituents don't specifically
participate in the SnAu intermetallic (IMC) reaction. The other elements
may inhibit the reaction by being a "more favored" IMC - the presence of
copper has been shown to do this. Take a look at Julie Silk's papers at
SMTAI 2013 and the paper at SMTAI 2014 in a couple weeks for additional
details.

Dave

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Vladimir Igoshev <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> ‎I'm trying to find information on whether Sn-Bi based solders are
> susceptible to Au embrittlement in a similar way as Sn and Sn-Pb-based
> solders do.
>
> I don't see why they wouldn't but need some confirmation.
>
> As always, thank you very much in advance for constructive answers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vladimir
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2