TECHNET Archives

January 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:44:04 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Steve,

The only place we use support mechanisms in our SMT process is at the screen printing operation.  We found them to be unnecessary in our placement machines.

Your results may not be the same due to differences in machinery or board rigidity, but it could be worth trying...

Leland

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vargas, Stephen M
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Placement Machine Board Supports

Good Morning:

I am looking to move away from tooling pins as a support mechanism for our high speed / flexible placement machines. I'm looking into some of the more prominent flexible tooling manufacturers in the industry (Gridlok, Quicktool and Count on Tools). We have Fuji equipment here, so I'm asking for some feedback about what other Fuji (or other placement equipment) manufacturers are using any why they chose that supplier (advantages/disadvantages). Offline responses welcome. Thanks you.

Regards,
Steve Vargas

ATOM RSS1 RSS2