TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kasprzak, Bill (esd) US" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:38:00 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Eric:

Not necessarily so.

We use water soluble flux on both NHB5300 and Mil-Std-2000A programs.
Without going into a huge amount of detail in this forum, I'll make the
following points.

#1 - Mil-Std-2000A no longer exists, your customer must be informed of this
reality. However, if they insist, the last known QPL (Qualified Products
List) for Mil-F-14256 (Another obsolete spec referenced in the 2000 spec) is
dated sometime in early 1995. Since you have to pick a qualified RMA flux
from this list, there are absolutely no guarantees that the formulations for
the same flux today is exactly the same as it was 4  years ago. You can
apply the same rationale to many of the reference specs in Mil-std-2000A.

#2 - The use of non-rosin fluxes was allowed in Mil-Std-2000A. One was
simply to get your customer to approve the flux, other options involved
testing. This testing roughly parallels the same kind of testing required
when using a non-rosin flux on J-Std-001A. We have one customer ourselves,
still living in the past with Mil-std-2000A, we are using the data used to
qualify for J-Std-001A as evidence of compliance.

#3 - In NHB5300, Chapter 9 addresses the use of Water Soluble flux. We
simply requested approval from the procuring agency based on the strength of
the testing we did for J-std-001A. We got approval.

In closing, both specs do not require the use of R or RMA. Certainly they
are the preferred since no specific testing other than an Omega Meter type
test is required for use. There are alternatives.


Bill Kasprzak
Moog Inc.
 ----------
From: Eric Kalgren
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Semi-Aqueous Cleaner...
Date: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 10:23AM

We use RMA because NASA's NHB5300 and the MIL-STD-2000A both require the use
of R or RMA flux.  Anything else has to be specially approved by the
military and NASA.  And despite the fact that I have heard that both
documents have been superceded, most of our contracts hold us to those
standards.


Eric Kalgren
BFGoodrich Aerospace
Data Systems Division
(505) 938-5139
[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2