TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 29 May 1996 18:24:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)

     
     To all,
     
     In reference to IPC-D-275 Section 4.2.1.2 Clinched Leads (Type 1) the third 
     paragraph states "Type 1 is not applicable to leads of dual-inline packages 
     (DIPs)...." Q
     
     Question: What are the technical reasons why Type 1 clinching is not 
     considered applicable for DIP packages ?  
     
     We have a customer who has designed a Class 3 board where all DIP packages 
     (as well as all pins for each DIP) are PTH with full clinch pads, the 
     clinch is towards the body. 
     
     Are there mechanical advantages to this method ? 
     
     What are the disadvantages ?
     
     This board is subject to both high temperature and high vibration.
     
     Any advise would be helpful.
     
     Thanks
      
     D.Drake
     
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2