Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:03:36 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Guy,
I have been working with Magnalytix to help develop their system and test
boards and am pretty excited about it. I will answer your questions a
little more fully in the morning.
*Douglas Pauls *| Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced
Operations Engineering
*COLLINS AEROSPACE*
400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA 52498 USA
*Tel:* +1 319 295 2109 | *Mobile: *+1 319 431 3773
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask] for all Export Compliant Items
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We have been exploring the J-STD-001G amendment.
> We think we have a "qualified" process because:
> 1. We have monitored our process for several years and established an
> action threshold at a level that is much lower than the old IPC limit.
> Because with know the "normal" ROSE test result from or Ionograph.
> 2. We have never seen evidence of corrosion on assemblies returned from the
> field. And have no reports of corrosion from customers.
>
> But, we have not done any SIR testing in years. The mix of parts and part
> densities have changed dramatically. We have no reason to trust the old SIR
> test results.
> We would like to gather objective evidence that our cleaning process is
> compliant.
>
> Any experience out there with the Magnalytix system?
> Any advice about test coupon selection?
> Anyone?
>
|
|
|