Larry - Please don't speak for me unless you ask for my comments.  I don't 
sell equipment or processes.  I am one of your customers and you are not 
listening.  We used AT&T equipment for over four years and we were better 
with it than your own Asian reps.  We thought we were good and had the best 
process available at the time.  Then we found a simpler process with much 
less sensitivity to process parameters than the AT&T products.  What you do 
with the information is up to you, I was informing other engineers that 
there is another way and it is up to them to do their own evaluations.

Best
Doug Mills

From:	IN%"[log in to unmask]"  6-FEB-1996 16:02:02.47
To:	IN%"[log in to unmask]"
CC:	IN%"[log in to unmask]", IN%"[log in to unmask]", IN%"[log in to unmask]"
Subj:	AT&T Spray Fluxer - Clarification to Verifone's Comments

I would like to clarify comments made by Doug Mills of Verifone (January
22, 1996) regarding the AT&T Spray Fluxer.  His message relates an
inability to achieve desired results using the AT&T Spray Fluxer.

The AT&T units Doug refers to were of a prior (1987) design and have
nothing in common with present AT&T Spray Fluxer technology.  Thus,
Verifone's experience is not indicative of our current products, which 
are considered by many to be the best available.  Our prices are 
competitive, and as alluded to by Pat McGuine of Nicolet (January 15 
e-mail on same topic), we have an excellent reputation for service and 
support our customers on a 24 hour basis.

It would be our pleasure to send current information to any TechNet
subscriber.

Larry Samson
Marketing Manager
AT&T Manufacturing Technology Department