TECHNET Archives

January 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Campbell, Murray" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Campbell, Murray
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 21:29:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Happy New Year All,

Is there any good reason to call out a maximum gold thickness / nickel thickness on fab notes or is it sufficient to rely on simply stating that the fabricator shall follow ipc-4552 minimum thickness?  I have seen some companies state that a maximum thickness upwards of 15 µin to be acceptable.  Is there any value in stating an upper range?
I know it states in 4552 that an upper range had been debated and not necessary but I still see an upper added to fab notes.

Regards,

Murray Campbell
PCB Design Specialist
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
[cid:[log in to unmask]]

"This message and/or attachments may include information subject to GD Corporate Policies 07-103 and 07-105 and is intended to be accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2