Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 1997 15:03:33 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'd agree with Greg Bartlett's memo (below). I've actually performed
the cross sections and have seen the damage. Also see the memo from
Gerry Gagnon on this topic. We have photos showing the plugged vias
bulge up and interfere with SMT components.
Paul Terranova
[log in to unmask]
Phone: 508-467-3109
FAX: 508-467-6796
DIGITAL's Analytical and Environmental Test Services Lab
Digital Equipment Corporation
M/S: MRO1-3/D2
200 Forest Street
Marlboro, MA 01752
From: NAME: Greg Bartlett <[log in to unmask]@PMDF@INTERNET>
To: NAME: Frank Hinojos <[log in to unmask]@PMDF@INTERNET>,
NAME: technet <[log in to unmask]@PMDF@INTERNET>
RE>Tented Vias
6/25/97
Hi Frank,
I'm not sure that there are many problems with tented vias entrapping
contaminants, but I'd believe that *plugged* vias after HASL can
cause
trouble. My guess is that the underlying reason for this is that it
can be
expensive and time-consuming to perform the failure analysis on single
vias
which might have failed. It requires microsectioning and
metallographic
inspection equipment, as well as skilled analysts, that most companies
don't
have.
In a past life, I was with a large OEM that had these capabilities,
and we
actually discovered some vias which had corroded through because of
the
presence of entrapped water soluble fluxes. I seem to remember that
it only
took a month or so to eat through the 1 mil of copper plating.
At Mercury, we haven't plugged vias for quite some time now because of
the
entrapped contaminant issue, but also because we had a problem with
the
solder stencil sitting too far from the board. This gave us lousy
printing
of our BGA patterns. We don't do any ICT, and we partially cover our
via
pads with soldermask. This, in conjunction with a bare copper/OSP
surface
finish, tends to prevent bridging through the solder wave.
Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems
Chelmsford, MA
[log in to unmask]
--------------------------------------
Date: 6/24/97 9:05 PM
To: Greg Bartlett
From: Frank Hinojos
A couple of weeks ago I asked all of you about the dangers of
using
tented LPI vias. I received an overwhelming response that while
it is
good for assembly, it may be very detrimental to the boards'
reliability due to chemical interaction of contaminants and
uncured
LPI in the via. Why then does it seem that everyone is using
tented
vias and why haven't we heard of problems arising due to your
concerns?
Frank Hinojos
Watkins-Johnson Co.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|