TECHNET Archives

September 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
roberto tulman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 23:25:57 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
We have been etching Ni/soft Au (2.5 micron) with std. ammoniacal etcher
without any problems
Roberto


At 08:27 AM 29/8/97 -0500, you wrote:
>What is the preferred chemistry for copper etching when using pattern
>plated wire bondable gold over nickel as the resist? Our Cupric etched
>about 50% faster than normal and seems to attack the nickel faster than the
>copper, leaving the gold undercut. I suppose this makes sense from their
>relative emf values (Au +1.498, Cu +0.337, Ni -0.250).
>
>
*****************************************************************************
Roberto Tulman
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
*****************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2