Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 10 May 1996 15:25:55 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good day, ladies and gentlemen,
I will appreciate if the users of the above laminates could comment
on the followings:
(1) The dimensional stability as compared to FR4.
(2) The price premium to FR4.
(3) What would be the most important criteria to consider for
switching from FR4 to CL 200+ ?
(4) It seems that if the yield is >80%, there is no reason to switch.
(5) What would be its classification under NEMA's nomenclature ?
(6) What are the pitfalls to observe when switching from FR4 to CL
200+ ?
(7) Last, but not the least, will the manufacturer of CL 200+ please
contact me personally via email. Just a gentle reminder that you
wouldn't run into marketing your products in this forum.
Thanking you in anticipation and have a great weekend.
|
|
|