TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Yeo Tiong Wee)
Date:
Fri, 10 May 1996 15:25:55 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
        Good day, ladies and gentlemen,

        I will appreciate if the users of the above laminates could comment
on the followings:
        (1) The dimensional stability as compared to FR4.
        (2) The price premium to FR4.
        (3) What would be the most important criteria to consider for
switching from FR4             to CL 200+ ?
        (4) It seems that if the yield is >80%, there is no reason to switch.
        (5) What would be its classification under NEMA's nomenclature ?
        (6) What are the pitfalls to observe when switching from FR4 to CL
200+ ?
        (7) Last, but not the least, will the manufacturer of CL 200+ please
contact me             personally via email. Just a gentle reminder that you
wouldn't run into             marketing your products in this forum.

        Thanking you in anticipation and have a great weekend.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2