TECHNET Archives

October 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard
Date:
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:09:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
Ingemar, Sorry, but you will get an answer. Here is mine.
In past jobs that I worked in, we screened (automatically) as many of the BGA balls as possible. With most of the newer X-ray machines, the software typically has the capability to set a nominal ball volume with a tolerance range, and can screen voids and check them with an algorithm to determine if the void is greater than 25% of the diameter and volume and reject them and mark their location so a rework operator can rework the component, if necessary. We were not able to screen 100% of the BGA balls due to shadowing problems from components on the back side, etc., but we can capture at least 90%. The X-ray screening also picks up solder bridges, missing balls, and other defects. A typical board required 3-5 minutes to go through the X-ray screen, but it was very effective in capturing the defects prior to test.
The discovery of many solder ball voids is what drove changes in solder paste, slightly longer TALT's, and DOE's to obtain the minimum amount of voiding. We were able to nearly eliminate process-caused voiding. So there are a number of process changes that can be made.

Presence of voids in the as-received BGAs limited us from totally eliminating the voids. If the parts you get have voids, then you will still have them after reflow onto the assembly. I have not found a way of getting rid of voids of this type.
However, I did find out that with the optimized TALT, those that were present in the component as received were reduced a small amount in both quantity and size.

There were other voids that are caused by soldermask defined pads, where the outgassing from under the solder mask went directly into the solder ball, and those caused by via-in-pad where the via was not properly ablated, or more accurately, not cleaned properly after ablation. Or not plated up to the surface completely.

There is not a lot you can do as far as "process modification" when you run into these types of issues.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ingemar Hernefjord
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] SV: [TN] Voids in BGAs, again

Ioan,

First: the Intel report was great, whoever sent the link.

Some reflexions on IPC 7095A:

1. What is the difference between A1 and A2, B1 and B2 etc?

2. <20% of the balls have voids: use as is. >20% use with process modification.  What modification, if 50% of the balls have voids?

3. The whole table, with percentage hither&dither, doesn't that demand for inspection of hundreds of thousands of balls in a mass production?
Do you do that? Is it based on sample or 100% inspection?

4. Ditto B1 and B2. All B2 to be returned to supplier. Won't that end in a lot of discussions with the package supplier? And judging the percentage, mustn't that take a lot of time? 

5. Ditto the rest of the categories. 

6. If to be followed strictly, won't that need best X-ray equipments, but still give some interpretation problem when you have to do with very complicated and large packages with thousands of balls and a thick metal cover etc?

7. Are any of you at all following the std daily? No..kidding. Of course I'll not get an answer on that.

8. We accept 'no voids at all'. With this std we may relax a little, finding 'right' category...

Best regards

Ingemar Hernefjord
Ericsson Microwave Systems

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Tempea, Ioan
Skickat: den 17 oktober 2005 15:03
Till: [log in to unmask]
Ämne: [TN] Voids in BGAs, again

Hi Technos,

I know this has been debated at least once a month, but I will not ask what is the acceptability.

What I want to know is if anybody had the ocasion to actually see failures related to voiding. How did you realize they were due to voiding? Also, do you have any dirty pictures of the issue?

Thanks,
Ioan

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2