TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 10 May 1996 10:39:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Good Morning All,

In a message dated 96-05-09 16:17:13 EDT, Lyn Lynch wrote:

>     Look at the QPL for MIL-C-46058. This won't give you performance 
>     results, but it will tell you which coatings have passed the 
>     performance requirements sections of the specification. Part of 46058 
>     requires humidity exposure testing per MIL STD 810. I believe this 
>     testing is done with the power off.

The testing in MIL-I-46058 is done per MIL-STD-202, method 106, which is a
cyclical temperature humidity profile (25C to 65C, 90% RH, twice per day).
 During all times when measurements are not being made, there is a polarizing
voltage of 100 volts DC applied.  Measurements are made at 500 volts DC.

>     
>     As far as powered-up, high moisture environmental test results, I 
>     suspect that you would need to test your specific design for 
>     performance.

I agree, but the question become how to test.  We deal with a number of
customers who have their own burn-in tests under various accelerating
conditions.  Some do high temp, high humidity, some cyclical, some freezing.
 It all depends on what will best find your infant mortality cases.

Doug Pauls
CSL



ATOM RSS1 RSS2