TECHNET Archives

July 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:43:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Nice to see some consistent units - g/in^2 here. Haven't seen this mix since
I came across a stress quoted in N/in^2 ;-).....





> Hi Steve!
>
> The formula that has been floating around for a while is that you get
> 30-grams of surface tension for every square inch of pad surface....
>
> -Steve Gregory-
>
>
> > Question?
> >
> > There is a formula somewhere which I can use to calculate the maximum
> > allowable mass of a component in relation to the pad lands. Basically
>  I
> > want to make sure our designers do not put components on the underside
> > of the PCB which are going to fall off during doublesided reflow.
> >
> > I would like to point out that this is a design for manufacturability
> > question, not an attack on the tentative grasp on reality some card
> > designers have.
> >
> > Steve.
> >
>
>
>


Eric Christison

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2