Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sun, 29 Sep 1996 23:31:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 96-09-26 15:40:13 EDT, you write:
> I believe the advantage Persulfate has over peroxide sulfuric in
> removing residues is it's undercutting ability due to the nature of
> the etch. At a previous job, I had used the Persulfate to do what
> you suggest. I also have learned that it is better to spend the
> resources trying to fix the residue problem than band-aid the problem
> with a more aggressive etch. What I found was that unless you want to
> etch huge amounts of Copper to undercut the mask residue, the fix will
> work when the residues are mild, but fail when they get bad.
>
The above is right on the money. Look into developer/rinsing issues. Some
of these soldermasks leave residues in the developer/rinse that are
essentially impossible to remove chemically, and will eventually clog
nozzles, etc.
Another approach that one of customers found, quite incidently, was that a
mildly alkaline (pH = 9-10) cleaner did a marvelous job of cleaning up the
surface before microetch, did not attack the mask, and allowed a minimal
microetch to give a thoroughly clean, and wettable surface.
Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company
phone 415-962-8004
fax 415-962-0370
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|