TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JIM ENNIS <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Aug 96 10:45:00 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)

A subcontractor of ours has asked for solder thieves to be added to SOICs 
that are placed on the solderside of our products.  Others have maintained 
that, if the process is in control, these are not needed.
     Can someone offer data (no opinions, please) that show that these extra 
pad extensions are worth the extra real estate and pain to design 
(orientation, etc)?  Does this really offer a wider process window or is it 
a crutch for poor processes?

Thanx in advance.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2