Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 97 11:55:08 PDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Doug,
I guess the first thing to look at is if you are working under some
specification that addresses the issue of Burn-In. If no regulating document,
then I'd take this approach:
1) Failure due to nonelectrical material or system.
a) Repair with no additional burn-in. Develop corrective action if
necessary.
2) Failure due to component attach.
a) Replace component and reburn-in.
3) Failure due to component.
a) Replace and reburn-in if component supplier has no screening
process.
b) Replace with no additional burn-in if component supplier has
effective screening process.
It sounds like you're in number 3) and you definitely want to avoid a
reburn-in process. If you choose to not perform reburn-in, I suggest you
document your justification and monitor the product. You might also want to
analyze all failures (at bench and in the field) before settling in on a
reburn-in process to look for trends and the overall effectiveness of the
initial burn-in.
Glenn Pelkey
Quality/Reliability Engineer
Maxtek Components Corp.
[log in to unmask] (Doug McKean) Wrote:
|
| Thought I had sent this out once before.
| Sorry if this is a repeat ...
|
| We have a product requires thermal testing -
|
| 50 degrees C
| Power ON
| full functional setup
| total high temp time = 72 hours
|
| PRIOR to electronic bench testing. We do this to weed out
| an infant mortality with board assembly, bad chips, etc...
|
| Now, if the bench test discovers or as indicated by front
| panel leds some failure and some rather large ICs
| need to be replaced, does the entire assembly go back
| through full cycle temp testing?
|
| This could have a major impact on stock and ship
| quantities.
| Plus only so many products can go in the chamber. Any
| retest knocks out *new* products coming through in the
| regular flow.
|
| Comments, thoughts, even speculations welcome.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|