TECHNET Archives

April 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:42:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (190 lines)
You should see no difference in the two ... all things being equal (like
the same volumes etc.)

Electroplating baths are ionic solutions. They are acid based solutions
with metal ions. So resistivity of the water used in bath maintenance is
not so important as what is in the water.

In incoming water may contain contaminants, or even additives, additives
like chlorine. Chloride concentration will have an effect on things like
anode corrosion. City water in the fall is laced with chlorides which
the municipality increases to fight intestinal disease (at least in New
England). I could maintain chloride levels in the fall without making
additions in New Hampshire. Plating bath maintenance changes seasonally
based on the water contaminants, additives and temperature.  


Many companies use RO and ionic exchange colums to remove the variables
inherent in "City" water. Treating the incoming water also allows the
water to warm up to room temperature.

When I was working in a shop outside of Boston (in a city that starts
with W) the incoming water was not pure enough to be dumped down the
drain and meet EPA requirements. The city water was clean enough to
drink but not clean enough to go directly into the sewer without
treatment.


PS. I think I am not able to post to technet again. Might be an email
issue at our end. If this bounce back from TechNet I'll ask to have it
fixed.

Paul Reid

Sincerely, 
Paul Reid 

Program Coordinator 
PWB Interconnect Solutions Inc. 
235 Stafford Rd., West, Unit 103 
Nepean, Ontario 
Canada, K2H 9C1 
613 596 4244 ext. 229 
Skype paul_reid_pwb 
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: April 6, 2011 8:33 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] [TechNet] DI water and plating

I am being vague on purpose. 

Lets try this.  Lets say I have two scenarios.  In the first scenario,
DI 
water is generated at about 16 megohm-cm and is fed directly into the 
plating tanks.  Chemically clean and high resistivity.  Second
situation, 
the DI water goes into a large holding tank (plastic) where the 16 
megohm-cm water becomes 2 megohm-cm water just from sitting around, and 
gets piped into the plating tank.  Still clean chemically, but now has 
lower resistivity from CO2 mixing.  Lets say the tank is silver plating,

just for fun.  Am I going to see any difference in plating between the
two 
scenarios, all other factors being equal, because one has lower 
resistivity than the other?

Doug Pauls



Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]> 
04/05/2011 08:08 PM

To
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TechNet] DI water and plating






Hmm, Doug, I too must ask for some clarification for your question.  All

electroplating baths I know have high concentrations of acids or highly 
conductive salts, to the point that the bath should have essentially
zero 
resistance.  The voltage registered when electroplating is that used to 
reduce metallic ions to elemental metal, not to drive current through
the 
bath.  That
 
This voltage is the basis of the electomotive scale or electromotive 
force.   It is always good to use DI water to make up an electroplating 
bath, because some common anions - like chloride - need to be well 
controlled.  For instance in a sulfate copper electroplating bath,  the 
chloride acts as the "anode corroder" causing the metallic copper 
electrode to be "etched" with a film of cupric chloride and go into 
solution. 
 
Are you thinking about the rinse water after plating?
 
Denny



-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tue, Apr 5, 2011 12:04 pm
Subject: [TechNet] DI water and plating

Good morning all.  I have a general question for those of you who deal 
with electroplating.  How critical is the resistivity of the water to
the 
plating process?  I am not talking about impurities in the water, only
the 

resistivity of it?

Doug Pauls

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2