TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Lynch, Lyn" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 07 Mar 96 13:00:57
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)

     Have you considered using a pneumatic "jack hammer" style vibrator?
     I have no specific hardware in mind, but, you seem to be inventive.
     Powder coaters sometimes use pneumatic vibrators for small batch work.
     
     Good luck 


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Vibrators
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet
Date:    3/7/96 10:45 AM


Address,
     
No PUN intended.
     
Does anyone have experience in using external solution vibrators 
in Wet area Processes?  Ultrasonics is out of the question, due to 
cost.  Direct attachment of vibrators to the plating tanks is out 
of the question, since we are using polypropylene tanks.  
     
For the past several weeks I've been evaluating Teflon and some 
new chemicals by manual vibration (a hammer to the plating racks). 
I now know this works, but who and where do I get the vibrators 
from?  And what type of cost are we looking at?  
     
Can someone advise immediately.  I would like to continue my 
evaluations with automated vibrators.
     
Regards,
     
John Gulley - Process Engineering
email: [log in to unmask]
214-340-0543
     
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2