TECHNET Archives

May 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 May 2007 23:08:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Inge,



I don't think you can compare those X-sections with yours. It looks like they might have been were taken in the compositional mode.



As far as the fracture surfaces is concerned, then the first one looks like fracture with a lot of shear, while the other one doesn't show any shear deformation. So, again, I wouldn compare them.



Reghards,



Vladimir 



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Wed May 09 22:21:43 2007

Subject: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Hi Inge,



Got your pictures, and posting links below each of your descriptions. I 

didn't get the third fracture image...



-Steve-



----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Hfjord" <[log in to unmask]>

To: <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:19 AM

Subject: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance





For the continued discussion (hope some still want) I send five images

from Dr. Vianco / Sandia Labs.



One shows normal ductile fracture (Werner will like that)

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/files/image001.jpg



One shows poor ductility fracture

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/files/image002.jpg



One shows bad(?) fracture from my customer's failing parts

(Didn't get that one...)



Also,



One shows polished, non etched cross section from 63Sn

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/files/63Sn.jpg



One shows polished, non etched cross setion from 60Sn

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/files/60Sn.jpg



One shows polished, non etched cross section from Tin-rich phases

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Tin_Rich.jpg



The crossections I've sent to you don't look like any of the three

above.







-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----

Från: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Hernefjord Ingemar

Skickat: den 9 maj 2007 08:04

Till: [log in to unmask]

Ämne: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



I'm sorry, Steve,

First two pictures became wrong somehow, should be light microscope

images. I send the correct ones to you. Sorry for the extra job I cause.

So, skip photos new xsections_1 and _2.

Inge



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory

Sent: den 8 maj 2007 22:24

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Hi Inge!



Not home quite just yet. Been shadowing a MPM field service guy who's

here fixing our printer. Poor thing went absolutely bonkers and crashed

it's camera. Don't know why it did what it did, but we've been fixing it

most of the day...



Anyways, the links to your pictures are below in your descriptions of

everything...



-Steve-



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hfjord

Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:45 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Vlad & TN gnus,



Hey, curious? I'm still concerned, but at a higher level, as said

Newton. To begin with, I Xsectioned samples from failed part AND known

good references. Both finished with 0.1 micron diamond milk. Etched for

10 second, 5 seconds, 1 second and no etching at all. Same result: voids

in the failed parts, absolutely flat with references. I'll send photos

to Mr Wallman, alias Steve.



Pic new xsections_1 : typical solder joint with void concentrations

under the lead's foot. Not etched.

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/VD0_8073_NEWXSECTION_1.jpg



Pic new xsections_2 : details from under the lead's foot. Nickel plating

seen clearly, and a very thin nickel IMC layer. All bright areas are

predominated by Tin, very little Lead. Black spots are voids that

contains a little of everything debris from polishing. Not etched.

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/VD0_8073_NEWXSECTION_2.jpg



Pic SEM_3 shows following: from bottom copper pad / solder joint with

voids / lead with nickel finish. Not etched.

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/SEM_3.jpg



Pic SEM_1 shows upper part of solder joint, with lead copper uppermost.

Not etched.

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/SEM_1.jpg



Pic SEM_ 2 shows typical solder joint at higher magnification with

predominating Tin and also little Lead and Copper. Not etched.

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/SEM_2.jpg



As I said earlier, the references show no voids at all like the above.



Preliminary, I have excluded Black pads and Skip plating. Furthermore, I

don't think there are brittle copper IMCs either, even if there are

relatively high Cu peaks everywhere. Think Cu peaks come from

preparation. Nor is it likely with Ni IMCs, they belong to the interface

parts. So, what is this? Someone mentioned a insufficient soldering

process, and that is finally what I begin to think too. Against this

speaks the very experienced and big company that makes these boards (one

of the big elephants, not Ericsson, not American). On the other hand,

even the best can fail.



The failure appears randomly around the world, much annoying for the

customers, and the technicians scratch their heads.



Finally, I remind you all about the fact, that the fractures start close

to the solder pads and spread to the middle of the solder joints. And

only on the large FPGAs. No other components are hit.



Inge







-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----

Från: Vladimir Igoshev [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Skickat: den 8 maj 2007 15:47

Till: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Hfjord

Ämne: RE: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



So inge,



What the cross-section looked like? :-)



Vladimir



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hfjord

Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:57 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Diet Coke! Man! Does not remove black pads on your teeth..

New samples are ordered, will try both oxides on paper and diamond on

nylon.

If the customer pays, I may try even FIB or TOFSIMS. Both are superior,

and even if the time tax is high, I must say that polishing, and

repolishing and endlessly repeated polishing can be quite expensive as

well.

Inge



-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----

Från: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För David D. Hillman

Skickat: den 7 maj 2007 14:23

Till: [log in to unmask]

Ämne: Re: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Hi George! Good comments! It does seem that the industry, at times,

spends more time in describing a phenomena rather than resolving the

root cause



so that we can avoid a reoccurrence. As for Inge's Monday dilemma, I

would wait and see what the cross-section results reveal. If the

observations are that the nickel plating grain boundaries look bad, then

I would work



with my pwb fabricator on what went wrong in the plating bath. It the

observations are that the nickel plating grain boundaries look good, I

would chase either a poor solderability or a poor soldering process root



cause. As you noted, the plating chemistry suppliers have worked

extremely hard on making the ENIG plating process more robust and "real"

black pad



problems are less prevalent today. I have always viewed the solution to

black pad as one of two choices: don't use ENIG or work very closely

with the pwb fabricator.  Here is an article reference which I think

really does the best job to date, of describing the root cause of black

pad (one of the contributors is our good fried Dick Coyle!).



Zeng, Steirman, Abbott, Murtuza, "The Root Cause of Black Pad Failure of



Solder Joints with Electroless Ni/Immersion Gold Plating", JOM, June

2006, pp. 75-79



The reality for us may be that no amount of plating bath control will

completely eliminate the potential of having a black pad situation and

that a risk assessment on a product basis is the final solution. Ouch,

way too much thinking on a Monday before I have had a Diet Coke!



Dave







"Wenger, George M." <[log in to unmask]>

05/04/2007 07:56 PM



To

"TechNet E-Mail Forum" <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>

cc



Subject

RE: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance













David,



I hate the "B" word because it describes an optical appearance rather

than a failure mechanism.  I've heard the "B" word as well as terms like

"weak Nickel" and "Black Line Nickel" used many times to describe ENIG

failures.  The reason I don't like these terms is because they are

adjectives to describe what one thinks they see and don't describe the

failure mechanism that causes the brittle interface failures.  We use

ENIG on an old telecommunications legacy product because it wouldn't be

profitable to do any engineering evaluations to qualify another surface

finish.  However, since the root cause of the ENIG solder joint failure

mechanism has never been understood or resolved to the point where one

can turn it on or off, we avoid the use of ENIG surface finish on all

new products.  Even though the suppliers of ENIG chemistry have done a

great job of monitoring their chemistry and educating board shops on the

proper controls to reduce the occurrences of brittle solder joint

failures they haven't been able to eliminate these type of failure.

Ingemar is one of the few people I know of on TN that not only has a

great understanding of solder joints but appreciates the process control

details one needs to follow in PCB fabrication as well as PCBA to avoid

un-reliable solder joints.  His current problem (i.e., not being able to

understand the failure mechanism or predict when it is going to happen)

is the major reason we avoid the use of ENIG surface finish.



Let's just say Ingemar does a cross section and confirms that there is

"mud flat" nickel grain boundary attack, what does he do on Monday?

Your advice about having a beer because it is Friday and not worrying

about this until Monday only will help this weekend but come Monday what

does he do.  I assume that he's already using a "good" board shop and a

"Good" ENIG chemistry.  I know what we did and it worked for us but as

an engineer I'd really like to what the ENIG failure mechanism is and

how to avoid it.



Regards,

George

George M. Wenger

Andrew Corporation Wireless Network Solutions Senior Principal FMA /

Reliability Engineer 40 Technology Drive, Warren, NJ 07059

(908) 546-4531 [Office]  (732) 309-8964 [Cell]



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman

Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 4:45 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Hi folks and thank you Steve for being "TechNet Picture Central"!  Sorry



but just to warn everyone but I am going to use the "B" word shortly.

Inge

- take a close look at picture 4. As Werner pointed out the gold is

non-wetting the nickel  in number of locations. What really jumped out

at me is that "mud flat" appearance on some of the nickel surface

regions - a "mud flat" appearance is a classic indication of black pad!

I recommend you complete a cross-section to confirm that you have nickel

grain boundary attack.



But since it is Friday, go have a beer and worry about this on Monday!



Dave Hillman

Rockwell Collins

[log in to unmask]









Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: TechNet

<[log in to unmask]>

05/04/2007 01:45 PM

Please respond to

TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to Steve Gregory

<[log in to unmask]>





To

[log in to unmask]

cc



Subject

Re: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance













Hi Inge!



Got your pictures posted. Took me a bit, I was swapping our wave

solderpot from 63/37 to HMP. Done now. I'm getting quicker, I can do it

in 20-minutes now. Took me about 45-minutes when I first did it...



Anyways, here's the links:



http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic1.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic2.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic3.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic4.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic5.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pic6.jpg



-Steve-



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hfjord

Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:22 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance



Have an issue with (randomly) lifted FPGA leads.

Pic 1: good joint after pull test

Pic 2: ditto but high magnification

Pic 3: "rotten" joint after pull test

Pic 4: ditto but high magnification

Pic 5: "rotten" cross section

Pic 6: ditto but high magnification



60Sn on ENIG, obviously a brittle region. Suspect Kirkendall voids, but

the pockets with zillions of Tin spheres (0.1 to 2 um in size) points at

insufficient peak temperature to make 100% melt and good solidifying. If

these little balls were Lead, I could understand, but they are Tin!

Never seen like. Any "quickhead" out there, need fast advice.



Note: Pic 2, you can see the underlying board pad nickel as dark areas.

An experienced analyst will hopefully recognize. No Phosphorous peaks!



My Friday headache.



Inge



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing

per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]

or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------





---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing

per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------





------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain

privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.

If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately

and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of this email is

prohibited.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------

[mf2]







---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing

per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing

per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------






ATOM RSS1 RSS2