TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ralph Hersey" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
29 Apr 1996 08:30:07 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Mail*Link(r) SMTP               FWD>copper thickness

Gary,

The primary reason for "thick" copper inner layers is to reduce the electrical
resistance of the power/ground plane distribution system.  If you go from 70
micrometer [2oz/sq.ft] to 35 micrometer [1 oz/sq.ft.] thick power/ground plane
system, you'll double the dc (direct current) voltage drops with the power
ground system.  Depending on the frequency(ies) of operation, the effect on
high frequency analog/digital signals may not be as great.

A secondary concern is that some designs use the internal "thick" copper
layers for thermal spreaders to minimize the local increase of temperature.

Be careful about reducing inner power / ground planes without a good analysis
/ understanding of the design requirements.

Ralph Hersey
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
e-mail:  [log in to unmask]

--------------------------------------
Date: 4/29/96 6:39 AM
From: [log in to unmask]
Would like input on the subject of 1 oz. vs. 2 oz copper thickness on inner
layers. What types of end products would be affected if 1 oz. were
substituted for 2 oz? What design considerations are most critical? Is it
safe to say that 1 oz. vs. 2 oz. should no longer be an issue? 
Thank you for input.
Gary Longman
Electropac


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by quickmail.llnl.gov with SMTP;29 Apr 1996 06:37:53 -0700
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id IAA03734; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 08:23:50 -0700
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 08:23:50 -0700
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
	id m0uDsCE-0000CSC; Mon, 29 Apr 96 07:36 CDT
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 08:44:27 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Sender: [log in to unmask] (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: copper thickness
Resent-Message-ID: <"7FXaX1.0.3qA.SVBXn"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3706
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]





ATOM RSS1 RSS2