TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Foster, Donald C." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 96 08:34:00 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)

Steve,

There would only be one potential benefit and that would depend on the 
application of your assembly. Ag additions at the 2wt% level do give 
improved creep performance. This could be important if your PCB is mounted 
vertically with heavy, and hot devices. All the data I've seen so far 
indicates that Sn62 has no better fatigue performance than Sn63.

The original intent of 2% Ag additions to solders was to  minimize the 
dissolution of Ag terminations of chip caps and resistors into the solder 
joint by reducing the Ag concentration gradient and thus slowing down the Ag 
diffusion rate. Now that most chip device manufactures offer Ni barriers in 
their termination metallurgy, Sn62 seems redundant.

Don Foster
[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2