Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:41:58 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 17 February 2012 16:06, Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Fellow TechNetters:
>
> Q: How fragile are whisker?
>
R: Because they are monocrystalline, they are extremly strong. I don't
have facts, don't think anyone has.
> Q: How much vibration required to dislodge from base material
R: As the mass is nearly equal to zero, you need acceleration levels
far above the specification of the unit where they are situated. I guess we
talk about much more than 100 g's. Sure, it depends on the length. If they
are short, we may talk about thousands G's.
> .
> Q: How much air turbulence to dislodge from base material.
>
R: Air seems to make them vibrate, and the longest ones dislodges. We
got several millimeters long Tin whiskers in waveguides. The long ones
disappeared.
> Q: When broken do they shatter into tiny pieces or just two parts.
>
R: Seem not to be broken at all
> Q: Can whiskers inside a rack cause issues.
>
R: You bet!
Jay Brusse at NASA will give you much more details, if he reads this. I
have lots about whiskers too, but I doubt there are any mechanical data. If
there are, it's probably theoretical values.
>
> Victor,
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|