TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ralph Hersey" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
29 Mar 1996 18:02:38 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Mail*Link(r) SMTP               FWD>RE>Can This Improvement to TechNet be
Made?

I set up a "special" address in my address book to technet, then I just do a
"forward".

Ralph Hersey
Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory

--------------------------------------
Date: 3/29/96 4:26 PM
From: Schlice Dave

I try to use    [ReplyAll]   but I still don't believe that this does a 
broadcast reply to all.
                       DS
 ----------
>From: TechNet-request
>To: hadyle
>Cc: TechNet
>Subject: Can This Improvement to TechNet be Made?
>Date: Friday, 29 March, 1996 8:13AM
>
>I have recently subscribed to TechNet and have noticed that although
>many questions are asked I don't see all of the responses that I would
>expect.
>
>When I use the "REPLY" function of email, the original TechNet
>submitter's  address (the question asker) appears on the
>(send reply) TO: line and not the TechNet (forum) address. I suspect
>that some responses never get on the TechNet forum because of this.
>
>Can't this be changed so that the mail sent out via the TechNet forum
>has the default "Reply TO" address of [log in to unmask] ?
>
>If this is not possible, please reiterate to all subscribers, "Send
>responses to [log in to unmask] and copy the original submitter.
>
>
>
>


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by quickmail.llnl.gov with SMTP;29 Mar 1996 16:24:23 -0800
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id SAA28542; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:20:03 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:20:03 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
	id m0u2jeE-0000DKC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:15 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: Schlice Dave <[log in to unmask]>
To: hadyle <[log in to unmask]>, TechNet-request <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Can This Improvement to TechNet be Made?
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 96 12:19:00 MST
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Encoding: 29 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Resent-Message-ID: <"1driO.0.asF.OR3Nn"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3211
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]





ATOM RSS1 RSS2