Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:49:59 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996 13:01:25 -0400
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>From: [log in to unmask] (Mark Sattel)
>Resent-from: [log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Date: 96-09-19 12:40:03 EDT
>
>Sirs:
>
>I am presently investigating the need for conformal coatings on our
>printed circuit assemblies. Do you have any literature that discusses
>the relative merits and disadvantages? To date, our company has
>conformal coated 100% of our PCAs. But the cost of masking, spraying,
>and unmasking are staggering. My first instinct was to eliminate the
>coating except in high heat, high humidity environments. Our operating
>environments vary from freezing cold to hot and humid. Any information
>that you can supply will be greatly appreciated.
I am also very interested in this subject and people's experiences.
There's a study being conducted by the circuit card assembly and materials
task force of the EMPF (http://www.empf.org) to develope guidelines for the
use/non-use of conformal coatings. The study is underway now. I haven't
heard of any interim results. Check with them for further details.
_________________________________________________________
Gregg Klawson tel: +1.508.880.1822
GTE Government Systems Corp fax: +1.508.880.4316
Taunton, Massachusetts USA email: [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|