TECHNET Archives

February 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell)
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:07:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (159 lines)
To minimize your risks it should be avoided.  If you have to do it you
have to properly design your stencil to over come the solder drain.
There will be a noticeable difference between a VIP site and a non-VIP
site but you can get reliable solder joints that consistently meet IPC
requirements.

As I said earlier I would not recommend doing through VIP in less than
50 mil pitch SOIC, PLCC, SOJ's or discretes less than 0805.  All old
technology.  We used 13 mil drill which yielded typically a 10 mil
finished hole.  We have done 8 mil FHS and put VIP in 0603's but you fab
cost goes up because you can't stack drill as many.  Through VIP is
really becoming a dinosaur become you are limited to old technology.
Blind VIP is the new technology and that has issues as well.

The biggest risk is the PWB fab.  Typically when we have had problems it
usually turns into a PWB issue.  Usually we have found rough holes which
turn in to a plating issue.  We have also had situations where the via
information was not properly transferred to the gerber data and the
stencil was not adjusted properly and we had to replace the stencil.  

We try not to use VIP anymore but with our product lifecycle we still
numerous PCA's in production.  Via filling for both through VIP and
Blind VIP is becoming the best alternative.    

I apologize for my "whining" comment.  I will clarify that to make money
EMS' want things as standard as possible.  They do have to deal with a
lot of design issues that they have no control.  In this case we built
these for years and I have had several EMS' that have worked with us and
built VIP products successfully for years.  I have one that chooses to
whine about it yet cannot present evidence or data to support their
complaints.  If they are having a problem one would think it would be
easy to generate the data. It is a specific EMS issue and not the
general statement that I made.  Enough on my whining.

Russell Nowland
Alcatel-Lucent           
Supply Base Engineer
Address: 14000 Quail Spring Parkway, Suite 300
Oklahoma City, OK 73134
email: [log in to unmask]
Desk: 405-302-1660
Cell: 405-203-0034
Fax: 405-302-1622

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of BADRI
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 1:04 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Via in Pad question

Hello,

Had a nightmare in this issue last week. The boards we were assembling
had
open vias in the pad. All the solder flowed thru the via to the bottom
side
leaving nil solder for the component. We had to go for a redesign of the
PCB. Try to avoid via on pad.

Thanx
Badri

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Carl VanWormer
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Via in Pad question

I am looking for guidance on using vias in pads of surface mount
components.  The concept is great for high speed design, since it gives
the least inductance for mounting bypass caps.  It sounds easy, but I'm
sure there are some pitfalls and there may be some rules I will break.
Any guidance towards documents on this combination would be appreciated.
Also, any stories to scare me away from this approach will be fun to
hear.

Later,
Carl





Carl Van Wormer
Cipher Systems
1800 NW 169th Place, Suite B-100
Beaverton, OR  97006
Phone (503)-617-7447 extension 20    

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------







Disclaimer:
===========
This E-mail may contain privileged information and is intended solely
for the addressee. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message
in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
mail by mistake, please inform us immediately and delete this mail. Any
information expressed in this mail does not necessarily reflect the
views of Avalon Technologies (P) Ltd .
Avalon Technologies(P) Ltd shall not be responsible nor liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system.
Avalon Technologies(P) Ltd does not guarantee that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of
interceptions or interference.We have taken precautions to minimize the
risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out
your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot
accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
Thank you for your cooperation

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2