We obtained a loaner unit from TIC and evaluated it for several weeks.
       
        Despite numerous attempts (and two different Optimizer units) we never  
        got it to perform repeatably, and were unsuccessful in rationalizing the
        results with TIC.  

        We run two Sensby dual wave machines.  The Optimizer was very           
        inconsistent with respect to registering the chip wave when conveyor    
        speeds were greater than or equal to 4 ft/min.  Preheat temperature     
        readings (TC1-3) were not reliable one run to the next.  We'd           
        occasionally get spurious immersion depth readings, i.e. nothing at     
        0.060" - 0.084" , but a reading at 0.096".  TIC said the inconsistency  
        may have been from splashing on the laminar wave (I don't think so).

        Beware that TIC markets and sells the product only.  Real technical     
        support will probably only come from the Optimizer designers -- I       
        believe they're in Isreal.  TIC was reluctant to put us in touch with   
        them, and claimed we were the only ones to have reported such problems.
     
        Steve Beckman
        [log in to unmask]
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: SOLDER WAVE OPTIMIZER
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet 
Date:    8/14/96 12:36 AM
     
     
>      We are investigating the Solder Wave Optimizer made by 
>      Technology Information Incorporated.  Do any of you
>      co-TechNetters have any experience with this tool?  What are 
>      the pros and cons of the tool?  Your comments would be
>      welcome.  Thanks in advance.
>
>      Ron H.
>      [log in to unmask]
>
     

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************