TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Quinn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:04:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
We have just started using a dry film mask(Vacrel), which is about .003"
thick.  We are using a .006" stencil and printing .020" pitch parts, and are
measuring paste thickness of about .009".  We are using a metal squeegee,
but seeing some "dog ear" looks to the paste.  We seem to be getting a poor
separation of paste from the stencil.  The mask is about .0005" higher than
the pads.  Our variation in paste height measurements on a board has
increased by .002" from Photo Imageable to dry film.
   Are there any ideas on how to process a board with Vacrel to improve our
printing process?

Thanks for any ideas/suggestions.


Steve Quinn
Heurikon Corp
8310 Excelsior Dr
Madison, Wi   53717
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2